UCM, equality and "apostles of the worst" With little time right now to feed the blog entries substantial, I did not have much power. However, a few days ago, I came across the Internet on a dispatch from the Middle Classes Union (AAU), the union bosses of SMEs and independent. This dispatch date already there a year and a half, and more specifically of March 6, 2009. She said my speech
Tuesday March 2, 2009, as "Guest First Morning" on RTBF radio. In this speech, I proposed an analysis of certain excesses of capitalism and I suggested that this system is neither ecologically sustainable nor humane nor éconmiquement should be exceeded one day. UCM responded with a post titled "There's enough bitching," in which are expressed in the vocabulary the more ideological and more naive thought the usual objections of defenders of capitalist inequality and "corrections" of the state providence. Welfare state in which employers, professionals and independent not otherwise cease to want contribute as little as possible, as they allege a "rage taxatoire" - the MR has understood in his rhetoric that the UCM reflected nicely here. Do they not see that in reality, the private capitalist banking system (the same one they feel they must defend against the "equal society"!) Who pushed their debt, and takes them by the throat exorbitant rents that landlords are asking for their equally indebted than they, a logic that forces them to sell less expensive and also drives the state, heavily indebted banks too, to collect money that will swell the profits of banks - and all this makes it impossible for the independents, freelancers and SMEs to create employment. Sadly they are wrong opponent.
[Possible answer: the State need only show "responsibility" and avoid debt! That's a lot of nonsense. The state's task is to invest in our common future. The problem is not that he sometimes spends more than it receives. The problem is that to finance its expenditures (which are
our expenses, we must not forget), it must borrow from private actors. While the community may itself create the money it legitimately need - and it could create under democratic control, rather than, as now, controlled commercial bank! Do you know that in France, most recently, the entire collection of taxes on individuals spent in the reimbursement of the cost of bank interest on public debt? And this charge is an arbitrary payment of interest of the taxpayer to the banking sector, under the leadership of a state that has no alternative but to borrow at commercial rates to finance health, education, roads, etc.. in short, anything that allows us to be creative and "active" ... UCM probably treat me collectivist. Cheers intellectual subtlety.]
I copy the mail from the AAU below (open
Internet this Sunday, November 14, 2010 at 10:38). Not because it is a masterpiece of analysis - quite the contrary! Pamphleteer in his character and caricature, it is indicative of the persistent barriers facing those of us who wish to consider the future in a new light. SME owners and the self does not grow out, as the rage expressed here seems hasty. But it reveals how the alienation of the economic (or called such) is deep. You see, to read, how SMEs feel compelled to defend a financial and economic system they are in fact among the main victims, crushed debt and competitive pressures. You'll notice the clever use very little of the UCM alleged defects economic egalitarianism, which would be ... a way of wanting to discriminate against the weak! ... We thought that, unlike "big" boxes represented by FEB and UWE, the world of small business was a hotbed of alternative initiatives and people willing to think differently ... The UCM represents certainly not all, but the ticket shows there's still a long way to go out of the slavish mind. I wish you a happy and uplifting reading (until something better).
Ch A.
***************************************
 • WEEKLY No. 9 • March 6, 2009 |
 |
| Y has something bitch! |
| |
Tuesday morning, SME entrepreneurs and independent auditors of the "First" may have shuddered when he heard Arnsperger advocate for the end of capitalism.
According to him, in a free enterprise system, "we are busy to miss our existence." He wants to end the growth and sustainable development. And if there is more than enough to finance health care (good reporter's question), it does not matter, "is the system that creates conditions and needs." It is true that if our companies become poor enough to expectancy Life begins to decrease to 42 years there will be fewer health problems!
Arnsperger is a champion of equality. The welfare state corrected, but this is not enough for him. "Inequality is a fundamental problem."
All experiments showed that egalitarian states are extremely violent. On the one hand because he must cut the heads exceeding, prevent the most efficient to achieve. On the other hand because it takes away the weakest, so-called "socially handicapped", who can not join the standard.
That Mr. Arnsperger think he misses his existence is one thing. That from there, he defends a social model of civil liberties and without respect for the human being is only half amazing. It is a forum for the radio and in academia (he is a lecturer at UCL and researcher at FNRS) is worrisome. In these troubled times, the apostles and the worst singers of the Apocalypse may find an audience ... |
****************************************** *******
